General Discussions:
Green Talk
Kids Eco Corner
Spam-Carbon Footprint
Natural Skin Care
Transportation:
Eco Roadside Assistance
Biodiesel/Clean Diesel
Carbon Offsets
Electric Bicycles
Electric Vehicles
Fuel Cell & Concept Vehicles
Hybrid Vehicles
Public Transportation
Clean Power Alternatives:
Batteries & Storage Devices
Geothermal & Ground Source Power
Hydro-Electric
Solar Power
Wind Power
Green Events:
Eco Chic Events
Green Hollywood
Garage:
Hazardous Material Storage/Disposal
Garden & Yard:
Green Garden & Yard
Compost
Recycling
Household:
Green Building
Energy Efficient Homes
Green Furniture
Retrofitting Older Homes
Stop Your Junk Mail
Want Us to Add a Forum?
click here
Re: Coal Sweetened Biomass
Coal Sweetened Biomass By: ctyankee (5 replies) Wed, 02/20/2008 - 14:31
- Re: Coal Sweetened Biomass By: childress (04/17/2008 - 13:39)
- Re: Coal Sweetened Biomass By: ctyankee (04/17/2008 - 14:38)
- Re: Coal Sweetened Biomass By: Billy345 (04/17/2008 - 14:22)
- Re: Coal Sweetened Biomass By: Jeff Schultz (02/20/2008 - 17:51)
- Re: Coal Sweetened Biomass By: ctyankee (02/21/2008 - 09:51)
New Forum Topics
- cfc bulbs and disposal
- Burt's Bees bought by Chlorox for $925 Million
- California Government Buildings Go Green!
- Can you really run car with water?
- bath salts as natural skincare
- Finding a "green" architech9did I spell that wrong?)
- Flush Green!
- Boston Oil Party, Anyone?
- Polar Bear Tragedy
- bicycles non electric
- Home Electricity PowerCost Monitor
- FreeCycle Network
- Ed, need help to find eco home inspection in Detroit area
- Go Green with a Professional! Green Architects, Builders, and Green Consultants by Nichoel Farris, Lime Designs
- I am selling my carbon footprint to promote awareness
- Embodied Energy - False "Profits" - and Bamboo Flooring
- Birkenstocks Not Required: Holistic Green Homes & Green Building for the Average Joe (and Jane!)
- Birkenstocks Not Required: Holistic Green Homes & Green Building for the Average Joe (and Jane!)
- Best safest battery system for home solar systems around
- Finding the best E-bike for you
Active Forum Topics
- Polar Bear Tragedy
- Home Electricity PowerCost Monitor
- Investors Wanted: Solar Electricity Long Term Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) $90/MWh cost --> $150/MWh price + index
- cfc bulbs and disposal
- Boston Oil Party, Anyone?
- Flush Green!
- I am selling my carbon footprint to promote awareness
- Burt's Bees bought by Chlorox for $925 Million
- California Government Buildings Go Green!
- Can you really run car with water?
- Go Green with a Professional! Green Architects, Builders, and Green Consultants by Nichoel Farris, Lime Designs
- Birkenstocks Not Required: Holistic Green Homes & Green Building for the Average Joe (and Jane!)
- E-Bicycle in Arizona
- Finding a "green" architech9did I spell that wrong?)
- Help me to be cured of blackheads.

Re: Coal Sweetened Biomass
BTW: If greenhouse warming is the issue, CO2 is CO2 it doesn't care
where it came from. A lb of carbon from wood is the same as coal, oil
or gas. I know you know this already, but others may have different
notions.
True
Not so much
This is a non sequitur. Just because the CO2 doesn't know where it came from does not mean that they are equivalent to the system taken as a whole. There is currently no methodology in use today for taking the the CO2 released from buring coal, oil or gas back underground into the "carbon input pool" it came from.
If I burn a tree for fuel, and I plant a tree for fuel, in 25 or 50 years or so I've 'recaptured' that carbon back to the original pool it came from. Better yet, a biomass crop like Miscanthus that has a rapid turnaround with little man-made input required, where the CO2 released from buring this years crop is recaptured for next years.
That is the fallacy of this argument: CO2 itself is like a coin that's been flipped doesn't know where it came from, however like the person that bet 'heads' and the coin came up tails, it does indeed matter to us.
Why? Well, you release a bunch of CO2 from one pool into the system and it can't go back into that pool, it has to go somewhere else: either by staying in the system or by increase the size of one of the other absorbing pools.
In answer to your questions, there are a significant number of coal-fired plants in the US, and there are more 'on the way' in the planning and building stages. They are not going to be decomissioned at the drop of a hat. Finding ways to make them 'more green' by co-firing biomass is an imperitive half-step to reduce the amount of carbon released from the underground source. Studies have shown that Miscanthus can be co-fired up to 50% with coal in coal-fired power plants.
See photo of Miscanthus bales outside a coal plant in the UK, scroll down to the second 'page':
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=51557
This is a -good- thing.
Your question revolved around adding a bit of coal to burning biomass; the real brass ring is to get the opposite to happen-- all the existing coal plants to addition in as high a percentage of biomass possible.