Re: Global Warming - I love that it's finally getting attention

The point I was trying to make was that the GHG that we, as humans, put into
the atmosphere, which elevate the temperature of the entire globe, because the
sun has so much energy and if some does not escape back out into space then we
see what we're seeing now - global warming - that in turm has a direct impact
on ocean temperatures. A single degree of increase that is caused by this
"cause and effect" situation will release more H20 into the environment.
So, your H2O GHG argument has limited merit yet seems to miss the bigger
picture...That we do, as a global race, have the power to bring back to some balance
our planet's natural ability to regulate temperature.

I respect that you remain anonymous and provide a healthy debate/perspective
- I think that is what this site is about. I see the ads on this site and
think those that put up, are probably legit and that Mr. Begley's group would
not allow any advertisers on this site that were otherwise. If you need
to get the word out how else can people investigate your product/service
without you putting it out there - either through the posts or as I see it,
supporting this site. I can't imagine this site costs nothing to run and
I don't pay anything to participate here so, I'm guessing those advertisers pay
something and thus provide me/us/you a forum to talk/debate and hopefully learn
and maybe gain perspective along the way.

Your last point of recycling - there will always exist economies of scale
that provide a point of reasonable return for company that is either in the
business or waste management or recycling - your case leaves to few variables unknown
to know why recycling didn't work and really, it should be done for the greater
good without the notion of your HOA making a measly $0.25/lb. Provide the
reasonable alternative to letting aluminum (in all it's forms) from sitting in
a land fill for the next 1000 years rather than allowing a company, that may be
doing good, while turning a profit, to turn your trash (in this case aluminum)
back into something useful without creating the demand for new sources
which absolutely need to be considered in your evaluation of what the
"real" costs are. It will most certainly be the case in 9 times
our of 10 that recycling costs less than harvesting new raw materials to
achieve the same end product.

I appreciate your perspective and you seem like a thoughtful guy, but I have
to say, you seem a little ridged in your beliefs.

Cheers,

Billy