Home

Re: green unintended consequences

Re: green unintended consequences

Submitted by jstack6 on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 22:01.

these read like some corporation CEO wote them. They are full of bad information. So many I would take another 6 paragrahgs to refute them.

wind- more birds die on the front of vehicles than all the ind generators. Alss many more on windows of high rises. It's not the wind generators.

food crops for fuel- so what about negative crops like tobacco and sucrose corn surup. They kill us and no one says a peap.

solar- it's cheaper everyday, no pollution, no water use. evergreen solar panels take less than 1 year of energy to pay back. lowest carbon footprint in the world, and American made.

no nukes-brilliant since nuke is the most expensive power ever invcented, used 50% more water than coal and makes deadly pollution for thousands of years. Only renewable are good and safe and healthy yet cost less each year!

etc etc

 

 

solar stacks

»
green unintended consequences By: docblack (9 replies) Mon, 04/28/2008 - 05:21